welfare bum

Successfully missing the point since 1977.

Monday, September 18, 2006

more sequels than you can shake your ass at

does it mean that i'm too slow if i haven't seen Saw II yet even though Saw III is due out in theatres next month (and its musical representation as well)?  or does it mean that the Saw bad guy is going to be the next Jason or Freddy.  i really quite enjoyed the first film in the Saw franchise, but am beginning to wonder how long they will drag it on.  will they keep it scary, or will it become a joke on itself within a few years.  perhaps we can expect a Jigsaw vs. Chucky film to be out before the end of the decade.  i'd pay to see that .

sunday's Terry Fox Run was lots of fun.  i went to a different location than i usually do which turned out not to have a timer-clock for the runners, so unfortunately i can't tell you just how fast (or slow) i was running.  i would say that i was in the top 50% though.  not too bad considering that i was kind of out-of-practice.  i didn't reach my $1000 goal of sponsors, but through cash and online donations managed to get over $350.  a big thanks to everyone who chipped in.



  • At Mon Sep 18, 03:24:00 PM, Blogger Cuppojoe said…

    Saw II was too bad, as far as B Horror movies go, but it didn't even come close to living up to the first installment, in my opinion. It was kinda like Nightmare on Elm Street in the sense that the first one was so innovative that the sequels could never really re-capture that original feeling.

    Know what I mean?


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home